User talk:MGA73

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63

de:user:MGA73bot

Hi MGA73, I noticed that your Bot is not active anymore. Do you still need the botflag? Best regards, TenWhile6 19:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TenWhile6! No, I have no plans to use my bot on German Wikipedia at the moment. So you may remove the bot flag. --MGA73 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick answer, I will take care of that. Thanks for your great crosswiki work! It's nice that your CA is clear now, you may understand what I mean. :) TenWhile6 14:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you TenWhile6! I guess I made it in the news in German Wikis ;-) --MGA73 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TenWhile6! Of you are active on de.wikiversity then you are very welcome to have a look at v:de:Wikiversity:Cafeteria#Neulizenzierung_von_GFDL_auf_CC-BY-SA and comment/fix. I'm getting close to finish this project: m:User:MGA73/GFDL files. --MGA73 (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I am not really "active" out of dewiki. TenWhile6 13:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, thats okay. I moved some files from de:Kategorie:Datei:GFDL but there are soooo many. So I thought I would start somewhere else because there seems to be very few copyright issues on dewiki :-) --MGA73 (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

License review favor

Hi MGA73. Months ago, after I asked on Village Pump for somebody to do it, you reviewed the license of the 10 JPG files in Category:2010 orthophotomaps of cities in Asturias. Today, I've also uploaded the same 10 files in their original version (PDF format, from which the JPEG images were generated by me) to the same category. Would you be so kind as to do the same license review on them? The content is exactly the same as in the JPEG versions, but with a slightly higher resolution, so you don't need to look again at the source site if you don't want (if you want, the steps to follow are here). Many thanks in advance. MGeog2022 (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGeog2022! I reviewed the files. --MGA73 (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MGA73, thank you very much again! :-) MGeog2022 (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. Easy task when there is a good guide :-) --MGA73 (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This DR

Dear Michael,

Please feel free to decide whether to keep or delete this DR. The image is sadly unusable and I managed to upload 2 replacement photos. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly, if you know a solution to this second DR go ahead. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:BlackBoxComponentBuilder16rc6.png

Copyright status: File:BlackBoxComponentBuilder16rc6.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BlackBoxComponentBuilder16rc6.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:07, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Category

Dear Michael,

If you wish, please feel free to apply the {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} license and order a new flickrreview to images in the above category with your bot. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will have a look. And I wonder if Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Add_an_outcome_of_LicenseReview can help a bit :-) --MGA73 (talk) 12:27, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Michael for your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! Bot cleared most of the files. --MGA73 (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This DR and this DR

Dear Michael,

Does Commons need to keep this 2 images which are under DR. They are not used. And the original version is the image on the flickr source. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the files. They were edited and no reason provided why they were needed. --MGA73 (talk) 06:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. The images were not from the source and had no educational value. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Received an emailed undeletion request

I suspect that it's from an A1cb3 sock since it is a public domain Italian painting that was uploaded by an A1cb3 sock and the user that emailed me has similar interests with their uploads. I could simply undelete this since it is a public domain painting (it's one of Tintoretto's paintings of a Doge of Venice), or I could upload it myself using the same source or a different one if I don't like the source. Given our past discussions on PD files from LTA socks, I wanted to ask advice on what I should do. Abzeronow (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: Hi! A sock is not a reason to delete or deny undeletion. We only care if the file is free and usable or not. So if you feel like spending a little time to check the files you are welcome to undelete. I orefer to undelete because it is faster and it takes less space on the servers. --MGA73 (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll undelete it later today. Abzeronow (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Category

Dear Michael,

If you wish, please feel free to apply the {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} license and order a new flickrreview to images in the above category with your bot. The images seem to come from the US Embassy in Uruquay. Its your call. I don't know why the flickrbot does not pass the images initially but there it is. In Canada, Trump has slapped 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods. Tuesday morning will be a nightmare for our economy in Canada and many people here are angry at the US voters who supported Trump. Canadians are also scared for their jobs as Trump only cares for American jobs. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes it madness what is going on. I hope some republicans have enough and stop him. --MGA73 (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I think Republicans will just continue going along with it. As an American, I am ashamed of my government and as a Democrat, I loathe Trump and his ilk. My sympathies for Canada. Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm from Denmark and if Greenland wants to join the US they are very welcome to do so. But I really feel sorry for Ukraine and the other neigbours of Russia. And also for Canada and Mexico. And also for the americans that did not vote for all of this. --MGA73 (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think when Trump got re-elected president, no Canadian thought they would be targeted by the US after Trump had signed NAFTA II or United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement in 2018. This will hurt both US consumers and Canadian investors in the stock market sadly. No Canadian will want to buy a townhouse or condo in this turbulent time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help Michael. Its a sad day in Canada but Trump is now "Tariff Man". Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sadly Trump have shown that you can't trust the US anymore. I do not blame people in Canada for feeling unsure and not wanting to invest in anything right now. --MGA73 (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]