User talk:Alachuckthebuck
![]() | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Check license
[edit]@Alachuckthebuck:Hola por favor chequea la imagen (File:Logo White House - President Donald Trump (2025).png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.
Done by bedivere All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry to disturb you. I was reviewing some of these images and notice that most of the 290+ photos in the category above did not have a new flickrreview ordered. They were marked as size not found on January 22, 2024. Don't know if you wish to order a new one with a bot. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, I meant for a new LR to be reordered, but somehow, the rollback didn't go to the right revision. Please feel free to add templates as needed. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv, Upon further investigation, Because someone edited the file between when it was reviewed, and when I performed the rollback, the bad LR was missed. Please replace with generic flickr review template on site. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- OK. I'll try to order a new bot review for most of the unreviewed images or manually review some of the photos. I don't make mistakes with licenses...but you can never tell if someone has smuggled an image on a flickr account. People are sneaky. When I ask people to license an image on flickr, 2-3 people have complained to me about other people stealing their images. But they are OK with my request to relicense an image freely on flickr since I formally asked them by flickrmail. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- All of these were caused by flickreviewR 2 erroring out on a massive batch of files. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Check the license
[edit]@Alachuckthebuck:Hi ,please check the license of this photo (File:The antiviral mechanism of LC-Plasma.jpg) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- All the Best -- Chuck Talk 06:41, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 06:41, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck:Hi ,please check this (File:Logo Rapid Response 47 (USA).png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, the twitter account is not verified, and just links to the white house website, not it's own webpage. I have tagged for speedy deletion for this reason. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck:The twitter account says "affiliated a White House" in the check colour grises but the website of the White House says not copyrighted or says "CC-BY-3.0" (google translator). AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- I can't verify that it is an official account of the US government. That's the main issue. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:40, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck:Ok te voy a decir en español, según la cuenta Rapid Response en X (antes Twitter) (en el título lado derecho aparece una cuenta verificada que algunos llaman "check blue" o "check grises",las cuentas verificadas color grises son los que pertenecen a las cuentas para los presidentes ,gobiernos,etc. pero en la cuenta Rapid Response aparece una cuenta verificada color grises con descripción "cuenta afiliada a White House") AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- I can't verify that it is an official account of the US government. That's the main issue. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:40, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck:The twitter account says "affiliated a White House" in the check colour grises but the website of the White House says not copyrighted or says "CC-BY-3.0" (google translator). AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, the twitter account is not verified, and just links to the white house website, not it's own webpage. I have tagged for speedy deletion for this reason. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck:Hi ,please check this (File:Logo Rapid Response 47 (USA).png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewing Flickr files
[edit]Hey, messaging you since you're a license reviewer (and because I recognized you). I've had some problems with some files (File:Imelda Padilla, 2023 (cropped).jpg, File:Imelda Padilla, 2023 (alt crop).jpg, File:Mayor Bass with Representative Cárdenas announcing funds for new bus shelters, 2023.jpg, File:Alberto M. Carvalho, 2023 (cropped).jpg, and File:Mayor Bass meeting with LAUSD Superintendent Alberto M. Carvalho, 2023.jpg) as I placed {{PD-CAGov}} and a license review but the FlickreviewR 2 put a failed review on it. Some got deleted, but reinstated after I talked with the admins who deleted them, but I told them that I put the license review so that someone could add {{Flickr-unfree-but}} on it, and I wasn't sure if I could do so on my own. Was wondering if you could tell me what to do since you're a license reviewer. (also for File:George McKenna III, 2021 (cropped).jpg and File:George McKenna III speaking about the importance of COVID-19 vaccination, 2021.jpg, which haven't been reviewed yes). reppoptalk 03:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, The reason the review failed is because PD-CAgov only applies to state government, not local/municipal governments (like the city of LA and the mayors office) I cannot pass these files as they do have copyright, and the template you linked doesn't apply in this case, as it's used when someone changes the license on flickr, and there's an archive link. I hope that clears things up. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- But the PD-CAGov template directly states that it includes city and municipal governments? ("government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies)") The template of Flickr-unfree-but is also not for using when someone changes the license, that's {{Change-of-license}}, it's used to note that the Flickr file can't use a specific copyright template but it's still free (like File:Prime Minister Keir Starmer Portrait (cropped).jpg, which is non-commercial and no-derivatives but is under {{OGL3}}). reppoptalk 21:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Also see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/12#Los_Angeles_government_Flickr_accounts. reppoptalk 21:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- I stand corrected on where the law applies. This issue should be raised with the city regarding their copyright claims (the only one that might have standing is photos with people from LAUSD. I'll check to make sure I'm using the correct template, and review the other files. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)