Dadweynaha: Saraakiisha
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Boggani wuxuu sharxayaa doorka maamulayaasha (mararka qaarkood loo yaqaan adminssysops) ee Wikimedia Commons Ogow in tafaasiisha doorka iyo habka maamulayaasha loo magacaabay ay ka duwanaan karaan goobaha kale.
"Haddii aad jeclaan lahayd inaad codsato caawimada maamulka, fadlan ku dheji Guddiga Wararka Maamulka.
Hadda waxa jira 182 admin
Maxaa ka masuul ah? ==
Administrators as of Maaj 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 182
If 182 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Farsamo =
Maamulayaashu waa isticmaalayaasha Wikimedia Commons kuwaas oo leh awood farsamo oo ay ku sameeyaan waxa soo socda:
- Tirtir oo tirtir sawirada la shubay iyo faylalka kale arag oo soo celi noocyada la tirtiray
- Tirtir oo tirtir boggaga arag oo soo celi noocyada la tirtiray.
- Wax ka beddel farriimaha is dhex galka xaddidaad yar eeg sidoo kale Commons:Interface Offices
- Magaca beddelo faylasha
- ku dar oo ka saar kooxaha isticmaalaha
- Habee ololayaasha soo dejinta
- Tirtir oo ka saar qoraalada taariikhda iyo noocyada boggaga wax laga beddelay
- Ka soo deji boggaga wikiyada kale
- Isku dhafka taariikhda bogga
- Wax ka beddel filtarrada xadgudubka
- Ha ka dhalin dib u habeyn boggaga isha marka aad guurayso boggaga
- Ka gudub jeegaga xajinta iyo ciwaanka ama liiska madow ee isticmaale
- Fariin u dir isticmaaleyaal badan hal mar (farriin)
- Adeegso xad sare ee su aalaha API
Qalabkan waxaa si wada jir ah loogu yaqaannaa aaladaha maamulka.
Doorka bulshada =
Maamulayaashu waa xubno khibrad leh oo la aamini karo oo ka tirsan bulshada Commons kuwaas oo qaata dayactir dheeraad ah waxaana lagu aaminay agabka maaraynta iyadoo la raacayo heshiis/cod dadweyne Maamulayaasha kala duwani way ku kala duwan yihiin meelaha ay xiiseeyaan iyo khibradahooda laakiin hawlaha maamulka ee caadiga ah waxaa ka mid ah aqoonsiga iyo xidhitaanka codsiyada tirtirka, tirtirida xadgudubyada xuquuqda daabacaada tirtirida faylasha marka loo baahdo ka ilaalinta Commons kharribaadda iyo ka shaqaynta qaabdhismeedka iyo boggaga kale ee la ilaaliyo Dabcan kuwa aan maamulka ahayn ayaa sidoo kale qaban kara qaar ka mid ah hawlahan.
Maamulayaasha waxa laga filayaa inay fahmaan goals mashruucan oo ay u diyaar garoobaan inay si wax dhis leh ula shaqeeyaan kuwa kale si loo gaadho yoolalkan Maamulayaashu waa inay sidoo kale fahmaan oo raacaan Commons:Policy and Guides
Marka laga reebo doorarka u baahan adeegsiga agabka maaraynta dhexdhexaadiyeyaashu ma laha awood tafatir oo gaar ah oo hore oo xafiiseed doodaha dadweynaha iyo cod bixinta waxa ay ku darsanayaan waxaa loola dhaqmaa si la mid ah tifaftirayaasha caadiga ah Dhexdhexaadiyeyaasha qaarkood ayaa laga yaabaa inay noqdaan kuwo saameyn badan leh ma aha sababtoo ah jagada laakiin kalsoonida shakhsi ahaaneed ee laga yaabo inay ka helaan bulshada.
Talo soo jeedin ku socota maamulayaasha
Fadlan akhri Commons:Hagaha Maamulka.
Xuquuqda maamulka ka saar
Sida hoos timaada siyaasada de-admin xuquuqaha maamulka waa lagala noqon karaa dhaqdhaqaaq la aanta ama si xun u isticmaalka qalabka sysop. Gudaha RFP shuruudaha caadiga ah ee lagu go aaminayo la isku raacsan yahay ee RFP kuma jiraan Taa baddalkeeda " isku raacsanaanta aqlabiyadda waa in la isticmaalo" halkaasoo heshiis kasta oo hoos u dhigista ka sarreeya 50% uu ku filan yahay in meesha laga saaro maamulka.
Codso si aad u noqoto maamule
Dhammaan maamulayaasha mustaqbalka waa in ay maraan nidaamkan oo ay isbartaan RFA oo ay ku jiraan dhammaan maamulayaashii hore ee doonaya in ay ku soo laabtaan doorkoodii hore.
Marka hore aad Commons:Administrators/Howto oo akhri macluumaadka halkaas Kadib ku soo noqo halkan oo ku soo gudbi codsigaaga qaybta hoose.
- Kadib markaad gujiso badhanka ku habboon oo aad samaysato bogga-hoosaadka koobiyayso xidhiidhka bogga-hoosaadka sida "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username" dabadeed tafatir Commons:Administrators/Requests oo ku dheji dusha sare ee qaybta ka dibna ku dheji dhejisyada qaloocan (tusaale {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) transclude Ka codso ogeysiinta liiska daawashada MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice ama wax ka beddel MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice si aad ogeysiis u geliso haddii aad tahay maamule.
- Haddii uu qof kale kuu magacaabo fadlan aqbal magacaabista adiga oo sheegaya "Waan oggolahay" ama wax la mid ah saxiixna hoosta magacaabista lafteeda Adiga ama qofka ku magacaabay waa inaad wali ku dartaa bogga hoose.
Isticmaal sanduuqa hoose, oo ku beddel magaca isticmaalaha "username": |
Cod
Isticmaale kasta oo diiwaangashan ayaa ka codayn kara halkan in kasta oo kuwa wax yar ama tafatir hore aan si buuxda loo tirin karin Way fiicantahay in la bixiyo sababaha kor iyo hoosba sababtoo ah tani waxay ka caawin doontaa xafiiska xidhitaanka go aankiisa Miisaan dheeri ah ayaa la siinayaa doodda iyadoo leh cadaymo taageeraya haddii loo baahdo halkii cod fudud laga siin lahaa.
Dallacaadda ayaa caadiyan u baahan ugu yaraan 75% oggolaansho oo leh ugu yaraan 8 cod Codadka isticmaalayaasha aan diiwaangashanayn lama tiriyo Si kastaba ha ahaatee codsiyada xidhitaanka xafiiska xafiisku wuxuu leeyahay go aan uu ku xukumo is afgaradka bulshada go aankuna qasab maaha inuu ku salaysnaado tirooyin cayriin ah Bureaucrats waxa laga yaabaa, markay go aankooda kordhiyaan muddada RFA haddii ay dareemaan in samaynta sidaas ay waxtar u leedahay go aaminta is-afgaradka bulshada.
Faallooyinka dhexdhexaadka ah laguma tiriyo wadarta codadka ujeeddooyinka xisaabinta boqolleyda gudubka/fashilka Si kastaba ha ahaatee faallooyinka noocan ahi waxay qayb ka yihiin doodda laga yaabaa inay qanciyaan kuwa kale oo ay gacan ka geystaan fahamka kama dambaysta ah ee xafiiska xafiiska ee is afgaradka bulshada.
clear cache Isticmaal xidhiidhka wax ka beddelka ee hoose si aad wax uga beddesho bogga ku lifaaqan.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 18:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Dear community,
today I would like to nominate The Squirrel Conspiracy as checkuser for Commons.
Squirrel is an experienced admin in good standing, and active in CU related areas.
They have agreed in private to accept the nomination, and will add some details later.
Thank you, yours, --Krd 18:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
As the other active CU, I join in strong Support for this nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the nomination. I’m pleased to accept.
- I’ve been an editor for just over 15 years (since September 2009), and I’ve been an admin from 2012-2015 and from 2020-present.
- I do a grab-bag of admin tasks; mainly processing speedy and revision deletion requests, closing DRs, and monitoring the admin noticeboards to help with anti-spam and anti-vandalism efforts. I’ve filed a fair number of CU requests as a result of those efforts. Outside of admin tasks, I upload images from open access journals and do a lot of cropping borders.
- Elcobbola has been inactive since October and Krd does a huge amount already (#1 by count of admin actions over the last 12 months, a huge amount of VRT work, and is the more active of the two remaining CUs), so I’ve volunteered to help share some of the CU workload. I’m familiar with how IP ranges work from taking a Security+ cert course last year, and I'm on the project pretty much daily.
- I think that’s everything. Happy to answer any questions.
Votes
Support Good candidate. --Yann (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support 1989 (talk) 19:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Fit India 20:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support! Queen of Hearts (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support been nothing but impressed in my interactions with this user. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support REAL 💬 ⬆ 15:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support i dont know too much about him, but also community supports. so, it is weak support. good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Sure thing! signed, Aafi (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Strong support per Magog, and my own experience. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support nihil obstat. Good luck! RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support unconditional support Bastique ☎ let's talk! 19:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Good candidate Abzeronow (talk) 22:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Adamant1 (talk) 04:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support We are about to see one of the fastest close. Shaan SenguptaTalk 11:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Takipoint123 (💬) 16:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ternera (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:00, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Günther Frager (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Hehua (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Long-term experience user, no concerns. Jianhui67 T★C 18:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Taichi (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support no concerns here. Elli (talk) 06:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support HouseBlaster (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per answer given below. Glrx (talk) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support no reason to oppose. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: can you list "what must have happened" before a checkuser uses the checkuser tools?--RoyZuo (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: Sure! Before running a check, the checkuser needs to make sure the check passes three tests:
- Test 1: Demonstrated disruption to the project – CheckUser is only used to combat disruption of the project where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs to perpetrate that disruption. Most commonly this is spam or vandalism, but it could also be things like flooding a discussion to try to sway its outcome. The disruption is typically demonstrated in a requests for checkuser case with diffs to support the allegations.
- Test 2: The check is necessary to stop the disruption – CheckUser is only used when its use is necessary to stop the disruption. Or to put it another way, if the behavioral evidence is strong enough that an admin is comfortable issuing a block without asking for a check, then they should just do so. The caveat to that is sleepers: if a filer creates a case and the behavioral evidence is strong enough to block the identified accounts without needing a check, but the filer presents a reasonable argument that - based on the actor's behavior - there are likely additional accounts that haven't been identified, the checkuser can still run a check to identify those other accounts.
- Test 3: Running the check doesn't violate the privacy policy - Checkusers aren't allowed to reveal an account's IP, because that can reveal their location. If someone created a case accusing user:Example of logging out to double-vote in a discussion as IP 127.0.0.1, the checkuser would have to decline that case.
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thx. Good answers.
- Although there's 1 extra thing in my mind:
- the reported accounts must have some similarity. that similarity needs to be backed up by url.
- if the accounts are obviously two different people, or very unlikely a single person/entity, then a check might not be necessary. this is like a polar opposite to, as you mentioned, the scenario of accounts whose "behavioral evidence is strong enough", which also doesnt need a check to connect them.
- In my opinion, "disruption to commons" and "similarity" are two necessary elements for a check. What do you think? RoyZuo (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: In my mind, similarity was built into the first test. To make that explicit, where I said "where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs", I could rephrase it as "where there is credible suspicion that the bad actor is using multiple accounts or IPs", and then where I said "The disruption is typically demonstrated" [with diffs], I could change it to "The suspicion is typically demonstrated" [with diffs]. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for being longwinded. I wrote the reply above purely based on common sense and logical deduction, but afterwards I realised it's already all summed up at the top of Commons:Requests for checkuser: "you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related."
- Your answers are satisfactory. I hope you stick to such common sense. Thank you. RoyZuo (talk) 08:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: In my mind, similarity was built into the first test. To make that explicit, where I said "where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs", I could rephrase it as "where there is credible suspicion that the bad actor is using multiple accounts or IPs", and then where I said "The disruption is typically demonstrated" [with diffs], I could change it to "The suspicion is typically demonstrated" [with diffs]. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.