Commons:Administradores
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Esta página explica o papel dos administradores (as vezes chamados admins ou sysops) no Wikimedia Commons. Note que os detalhes de suas funções, e a maneira como os administradores são eleitos, podem ser diferentes de outros sites.
Se você deseja solicitar ajuda a um administrador, publique no Administrators' noticeboard.
Há atualmente 182 administradores no Commons.
O que é um administrador?
Administrators as of março 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 182
If 182 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Técnico
Os administradores são utilizadores com habilidade técnica no Wikimedia Commons para:
- apagar e restaurar imagens e outros ficheiros carregados, bem como ver e restaurar revisões apagadas
- apagar e restaurar páginas, bem como ver e restaurar revisões apagadas
- proteger e desproteger páginas, bem como editar páginas protegidas em qualquer nível
- editar o namespace MediaWiki
- acrescentar ou retirar determinados permissões de utilizadores
- configurar campanhas do assistente de carregamento de arquivos (Upload Wizard)
- ocultar ou restaurar entradas de registro ou revisões nas páginas
- importar páginas de outras wikis
- fundir históricos de páginas
- modificar filtros antiabusos
- não criar redirecionamentos ao mover uma página
- ser imune às spoofing checks bem como à lista negra de nomes de utilizadores
- mandar mensagens a múltiplos utilizadores de uma vez (massmessage)
- usar limites de API mais altos
Estas são coletivamente conhecidas como ferramentas de administração.
Papel comunitário
Os administradores são membros experientes e confiáveis da comunidade do Commons que assumiram trabalhos de manutenção adicionais e foram confiados as ferramentas de administração por um processo público de consenso / voto. Diferentes administradores têm diferentes áreas de interesse e experiência, mas as tarefas típicas de um administrador incluem determinar e fechar pedidos de eliminação, deletar violações de direitos autorais, remover ficheiros sempre que necessário, proteger o Commons contra vandalismo e trabalhar em predefinições e outras páginas protegidas. Claro, algumas dessas tarefas também podem ser feitas por não-administradores.
Espera-se que os administradores compreendam os objetivos deste projeto e estejam preparados para trabalhar construtivamente com os outros para esses fins. Os administradores também devem entender e seguir as políticas do Commons e, quando apropriado, respeitar o consenso da comunidade.
Além das funções que exigem o uso das ferramentas de administração, os administradores não possuem autoridade editorial especial em virtude de sua posição, e em discussões e votos públicos, suas contribuições são tratadas da mesma maneira que qualquer editor comum. Alguns administradores podem se tornar mais influentes, não devido à sua posição como tal, mas a partir da confiança pessoal que podem ter obtido da comunidade.
Sugestões para administrador
Por favor, leia a guia para administradores.
Remoção dos privilégios administrativos
De acordo com a política de remoção dos privilégios administrativos, esta permissão pode ser revogada por inatividade ou uso inadequado das ferramentas administrativas. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Candidatando-se para se tornar um administrador
Todos os interessados em se tornar administradores devem passar por este processo e se submeter a um RFA, incluindo todos os ex-administradores que estão buscando retornar às suas funções anteriores.
Em primeiro lugar, leia as informações que se encontram em Commons:Administrators/Howto. Depois volte aqui e faça seu pedido na secção que se encontra abaixo.
- Depois de clicar no botão correspondente e de criar a subpágina, copie o link para a nova subpágina, por exemplo "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edite Commons:Administrators/Requests e cole o link no início da seção, depois ponha-o entre chaves duplas para realizar a transclusão.
- Se outro utilizador nomeou-lhe, por favor aceite a nomeação indicando "eu aceito" ou algo similar, bem como assinando abaixo da nomeação. A subpágina ainda precisa ser transcluída por você ou seu nomeador.
Na caixa de abaixo, substitua "Username" pelo teu nome de utilizador: |
Votação
Qualquer usuário registrado pode votar aqui, embora aqueles que tenham poucas ou nenhuma edição anterior podem não ser totalmente contados. É preferível que você dê razões tanto para apoiar como também para
opor-se, assim ajudando o burocrata que encerrar o pedido em sua decisão. Os argumentos, contendo, se necessário, evidências e provas, tem maior peso do que simplesmente votar.
Para o pedido ser aprovado, normalmente requer-se 75% de votos a favor, com um mínimo de 8 votos favoráveis. Não se contam os votos de utilizadores não registados. No entanto, o burocrata que fecha a nomeação pode usar seu poder discricionário para determinar o consenso da comunidade, pelo que a decisão não se baseia necessariamente nos números indicados.
Os comentários neutros, indicados com o modelo neutro, não são contatos nas estatísticas indicadas no parágrafo anterior para que o burocrata determine o resultado da votação. Estes comentários são parte da discussão, podendo persuadir outros utilizadores e permitir que o burocrata entenda melhor o consenso da comunidade.
Purgar o cache Use o link que está abaixo para editar a página transcluída.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 18:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Dear community,
today I would like to nominate The Squirrel Conspiracy as checkuser for Commons.
Squirrel is an experienced admin in good standing, and active in CU related areas.
They have agreed in private to accept the nomination, and will add some details later.
Thank you, yours, --Krd 18:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
As the other active CU, I join in strong Support for this nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the nomination. I’m pleased to accept.
- I’ve been an editor for just over 15 years (since September 2009), and I’ve been an admin from 2012-2015 and from 2020-present.
- I do a grab-bag of admin tasks; mainly processing speedy and revision deletion requests, closing DRs, and monitoring the admin noticeboards to help with anti-spam and anti-vandalism efforts. I’ve filed a fair number of CU requests as a result of those efforts. Outside of admin tasks, I upload images from open access journals and do a lot of cropping borders.
- Elcobbola has been inactive since October and Krd does a huge amount already (#1 by count of admin actions over the last 12 months, a huge amount of VRT work, and is the more active of the two remaining CUs), so I’ve volunteered to help share some of the CU workload. I’m familiar with how IP ranges work from taking a Security+ cert course last year, and I'm on the project pretty much daily.
- I think that’s everything. Happy to answer any questions.
Votes
Support Good candidate. --Yann (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support 1989 (talk) 19:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Fit India 20:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support! Queen of Hearts (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Support been nothing but impressed in my interactions with this user. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support REAL 💬 ⬆ 15:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support i dont know too much about him, but also community supports. so, it is weak support. good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Sure thing! signed, Aafi (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Strong support per Magog, and my own experience. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support nihil obstat. Good luck! RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support unconditional support Bastique ☎ let's talk! 19:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Good candidate Abzeronow (talk) 22:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Adamant1 (talk) 04:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support We are about to see one of the fastest close. Shaan SenguptaTalk 11:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Takipoint123 (💬) 16:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ternera (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:00, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Günther Frager (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Hehua (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Long-term experience user, no concerns. Jianhui67 T★C 18:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Taichi (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support no concerns here. Elli (talk) 06:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support HouseBlaster (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per answer given below. Glrx (talk) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support no reason to oppose. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: can you list "what must have happened" before a checkuser uses the checkuser tools?--RoyZuo (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: Sure! Before running a check, the checkuser needs to make sure the check passes three tests:
- Test 1: Demonstrated disruption to the project – CheckUser is only used to combat disruption of the project where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs to perpetrate that disruption. Most commonly this is spam or vandalism, but it could also be things like flooding a discussion to try to sway its outcome. The disruption is typically demonstrated in a requests for checkuser case with diffs to support the allegations.
- Test 2: The check is necessary to stop the disruption – CheckUser is only used when its use is necessary to stop the disruption. Or to put it another way, if the behavioral evidence is strong enough that an admin is comfortable issuing a block without asking for a check, then they should just do so. The caveat to that is sleepers: if a filer creates a case and the behavioral evidence is strong enough to block the identified accounts without needing a check, but the filer presents a reasonable argument that - based on the actor's behavior - there are likely additional accounts that haven't been identified, the checkuser can still run a check to identify those other accounts.
- Test 3: Running the check doesn't violate the privacy policy - Checkusers aren't allowed to reveal an account's IP, because that can reveal their location. If someone created a case accusing user:Example of logging out to double-vote in a discussion as IP 127.0.0.1, the checkuser would have to decline that case.
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thx. Good answers.
- Although there's 1 extra thing in my mind:
- the reported accounts must have some similarity. that similarity needs to be backed up by url.
- if the accounts are obviously two different people, or very unlikely a single person/entity, then a check might not be necessary. this is like a polar opposite to, as you mentioned, the scenario of accounts whose "behavioral evidence is strong enough", which also doesnt need a check to connect them.
- In my opinion, "disruption to commons" and "similarity" are two necessary elements for a check. What do you think? RoyZuo (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: In my mind, similarity was built into the first test. To make that explicit, where I said "where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs", I could rephrase it as "where there is credible suspicion that the bad actor is using multiple accounts or IPs", and then where I said "The disruption is typically demonstrated" [with diffs], I could change it to "The suspicion is typically demonstrated" [with diffs]. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for being longwinded. I wrote the reply above purely based on common sense and logical deduction, but afterwards I realised it's already all summed up at the top of Commons:Requests for checkuser: "you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related."
- Your answers are satisfactory. I hope you stick to such common sense. Thank you. RoyZuo (talk) 08:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: In my mind, similarity was built into the first test. To make that explicit, where I said "where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs", I could rephrase it as "where there is credible suspicion that the bad actor is using multiple accounts or IPs", and then where I said "The disruption is typically demonstrated" [with diffs], I could change it to "The suspicion is typically demonstrated" [with diffs]. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.