Commons:Amministratori

Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Questa pagina spiega il ruolo degli amministratori (a volte chiamati admins o sysops) su Wikimedia Commons. Tieni presente che i dettagli sul ruolo e il modo in cui sono nominati potranno differire dagli altri siti.

Se si vuole richiedere l'aiuto di un amministratore scrivere un post su Administrators' noticeboard.

Ci sono attualmente 182 amministratori su Commons.

Chi è un amministratore?

Administrators as of marzo 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 182 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1 99of9, en (bureaucrat) A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2 Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1 Abzeronow, en, fr-1 Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2 AFBorchert, de, en-3 Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 Aka, de, en-3 Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1 Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2 Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1 AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1 Anthere, fr, en-3 AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward) Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3 Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1 Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1 Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1 Billinghurst, en Blackcat, it, en-3, fr BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1 Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1 Captain-tucker, en Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2 Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1 Common Good, en CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat) Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1 Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1 Czar, en DaB., de, en-1 DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1 Davepape, en DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward) Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3 DMacks, en Didym, de, en-2, fr-2 Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1 D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1 Ebrahim, en-3 Elcobbola en, de (checkuser) Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat) Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1 Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1 Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat) Explicit, en, es, ko-2 Ezarate, es-3, en-1 Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2 FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1 Gbawden, en-3, af-1 Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1 Geni, en George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1 Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3 Gnangarra, en, nys-1 Gnom, de, en-3, fr-2, it-2, es-1 GPSLeo, de, en-2 GreenMeansGo, en Grin, hu, en-3, de-1 Hekerui, de, en-4 Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1 Hesperian, en Holly Cheng, en, ja-2 Huntster, en Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2 Infrogmation, en, es-1 IronGargoyle, en, de-1 Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Jaqen, it, en-2 Jarekt, pl, en Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1 Jdforrester, en Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1 Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2 Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1 Joergens.mi, de, en-3 JoKalliauer, de, en-3 Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward) Josve05a, sv, en-3 Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1 Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2 Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1 King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1 Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1 Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2 Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1 Léna, fr, en-3, es-1 Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1 Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2 Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1 Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1 Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 Marcus Cyron, de, en-2 Masur, pl, en-3, de-1 Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1 Matrix, en, ta-2 MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1 MBisanz, en Mdaniels5757, en, es-1 MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1 Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1 Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1 Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1 Minorax, en, zh (oversighter) Missvain, en Mitchazenia, en, es-2 Miya, ja, en-2 Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1 Morgankevinj, en MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1 Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1 Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1 NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1 notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2 odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter) P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1 Pi.1415926535, en, es-2 Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1 Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1 Podzemnik, cs, en-2 Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1 Pyb, fr, en-2 Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1 Racconish, fr, en-4 Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1 Ra'ike, de, en-2 Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1 Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3 Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter) Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1 Regasterios, hu, en-1 Rehman, en, si-1 Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3 Revi C., ko, en-3 Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1 Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1 Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1 Royalbroil, en, es-1 RP88, en, de-1 Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2 Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1 Sadads, en, es-3 Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1 Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1 Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1 Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1 Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1 Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2 Strakhov, es, en-2 TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2 Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1 Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1 The Squirrel Conspiracy, en Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1 Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2 Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1 Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1 Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1 VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1 Wdwd, de, en-2 Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3 Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1 Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1 Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1 Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1 Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1 Yuval CT, he, en-3 Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1 علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward) Abuse filter, (automated account) CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request KrinkleBot, (bot) see request If 182 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

Questioni tecniche

Gli amministratori sono utenti con la capacità tecnica su Wikimedia Commons per:

• Cancellare o recuperare immagini e altri file caricati, verificare e ripristinare le versioni cancellate
• Cancellare o recuperare pagine, verificare e ripristinare le revisioni cancellate
• Proteggere o togliere l'eventuale protezione alle pagine, modificare quelle stesse pagine che sono state protette da altri amministratori
• Bloccare o sbloccare le utenze degli utenti, come pure gli indirizzi IP individuai o la gamma di indirizzi IP
• Modifica i messaggi di interfaccia meno restrittivi (vedi anche Commons:Interface administrators)
• Rinominare i file
• aggiunge e rimuove gruppi di utenti
• Configurare campagne per il caricamento con procedura guidata
• Cancellare e ripristinare voci come pure revisionare il registro specifico di una pagina
• Importare pagine da altre wiki
• Unire la cronologia delle pagine
• Modificare i filtri di abuso
• Non creare reindirizzamenti di pagine quando queste devono essere spostate e modificate dal nome di originale
• Ignorare i controlli di spoofing e il titolo, o il nome utente dalla blacklist
• Inviare un messaggio a più utenti e contemporaneamente (massmessage)
• Utilizzare i limiti più alti per le interrogazioni API

Questi sono noti nella collettività come gli strumenti degli amministratori.

Ruolo nella Comunità

Gli amministratori sono membri esperti ed affidabili della comunità Commons, i quali hanno intrapreso un ulteriore lavoro di manutenzione: a essi sono stati affidati gli strumenti d'amministratore e hanno un permesso pubblico per quello che può essere un voto/consenso. Diversi amministratori hanno differenti aree di interesse e competenza, nonostante che i tipici compiti degli amministratori comprendono: la determinazione e conclusione di richieste di cancellazione; la cancellazione di violazione del copyright; il ripristino di file se dovrebbe essere necessario; la protezione nei confronti di Commons da parte di quelle utenze che dalle loro modifiche ne fanno motivo di vandalismo; lavorare sui modelli (usualmente chiamati e conosciuti dal termine templates), ed altre eventuali modifiche nelle pagine che sono protette. Naturalmente, alcuni di questi compiti potranno anche essere svolti da utenti non-amministratori.

Ci si aspetta che gli amministratori comprendano gli scopi di questo progetto, e siano preparati a lavorare costruttivamente con gli altri per questi fini. Gli amministratori dovrebbero inoltre comprendere e seguire le politiche di Commons, e dove appropriato rispettare la collegialità della comunità.

Oltre al ruolo che richiede l'uso degli strumenti di amministrazione, gli amministratori non possiedono compiti editoriali speciali in virtù della loro posizione, e nelle discussioni e votazioni pubbliche i loro contributi sono considerati allo stesso modo di un normale utente. Naturalmente alcuni amministratori hanno più influenza, ma ciò non deriva tanto dalla loro posizione quanto dalla fiducia che hanno guadagnato all'interno della comunità.

Suggerimenti per gli amministratori

Leggi Commons:Guide to adminship.

Rimozione dei privilegi di amministratore

Secondo la de-admin policy, i privilegi di amministratore possono essere revocati per inattività o uso errato degli strumenti. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.

Richiesta per diventare amministratore

Tutti i potenziali amministratori devono passare attraverso questo processo e sottoporsi a una RFA, inclus tutti gli ex-amministratori che vorrebbero ritornare in ruolo.

Come prima cosa bisogna andare sulla pagina Commons:Administrators/Howto e leggere le informazioni che sono riportate lì. Dopodiché si potrà tornare qui per effettuare la vostra richiesta nella sezione sottostante.

• Dopo aver fatto click sul pulsante apposito e creare una sottopagina, copia il link nella sottopagina creata, per esempio "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", modifica Commons:Administrators/Requests ed incollalo in testa alla sezione, poi inseriscile fra doppia parentesi graffa (es. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} ) per includerla.

• Se un altro utente ti ha candidato, accetta la candidatura scrivendo "Accetto" o qualcosa di simile e firma sotto. La sottopagina dovrà sempre essere inclusa.

Usa il riquadro qui sotto, sostituendo Username col tuo nome utente:

Votazione

Qualsiasi utente registrato può votare, ma in certi casi potrebbero non essere presi in conto gli utenti con poche o nessuna modifica previa. È preferibile dare le ragioni sia per i voti  Support che  Oppose, poiché ciò aiuta il burocrate che dovrà chiudere la candidatura e prendere una decisione. Gli argomenti hanno maggior peso dei semplici voti, specialmente se sono apportare prove a supporto della propria opinione.

Normalmente l'approvazione del candidato necessita del 75% dei voti a favore, con un minimo di 8 voti favorevoli. Non vengono contati voti da utenti non registrati. In ogni modo, il burocrate che chiude la candidatura userà il suo giudizio per valutare il consenso della comunità; la decisione potrebbe quindi non basarsi sul semplice valore numerico.

I voti  Neutral sono commenti che non vengono contati nel totale dei voti per il calcolo della percentuale. Sono però commenti che fanno parte della decisione ed il burocrate che chiuderà la procedura ne terrà conto.

Purge the cache Usa il collegamento qui sotto per modificare la pagina in inclusione.

Requests for adminship

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for bureaucratship

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

The Squirrel Conspiracy

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/The Squirrel Conspiracy

• Checkusers/Requests/The Squirrel Conspiracy

Vote

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 18:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Dear community,

today I would like to nominate The Squirrel Conspiracy as checkuser for Commons.

Squirrel is an experienced admin in good standing, and active in CU related areas.

They have agreed in private to accept the nomination, and will add some details later.

Thank you, yours, --Krd 18:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

As the other active CU, I join in strong  Support for this nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination. I’m pleased to accept.

I’ve been an editor for just over 15 years (since September 2009), and I’ve been an admin from 2012-2015 and from 2020-present.

I do a grab-bag of admin tasks; mainly processing speedy and revision deletion requests, closing DRs, and monitoring the admin noticeboards to help with anti-spam and anti-vandalism efforts. I’ve filed a fair number of CU requests as a result of those efforts. Outside of admin tasks, I upload images from open access journals and do a lot of cropping borders.

Elcobbola has been inactive since October and Krd does a huge amount already (#1 by count of admin actions over the last 12 months, a huge amount of VRT work, and is the more active of the two remaining CUs), so I’ve volunteered to help share some of the CU workload. I’m familiar with how IP ranges work from taking a Security+ cert course last year, and I'm on the project pretty much daily.

I think that’s everything. Happy to answer any questions.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support Good candidate. --Yann (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support 1989 (talk) 19:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Fit India 20:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support! Queen of Hearts (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support been nothing but impressed in my interactions with this user. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support  $999$REAL 💬 ⬆   15:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support i dont know too much about him, but also community supports. so, it is weak support. good luck. modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 16:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Sure thing! _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 17:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Strong support per Magog, and my own experience. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 17:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support nihil obstat. Good luck! RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support unconditional support Bastique ^{☎ let's talk!} 19:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good candidate Abzeronow (talk) 22:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Adamant1 (talk) 04:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support We are about to see one of the fastest close. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Takipoint123 (💬) 16:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ternera (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 11:00, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Günther Frager (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support--Hehua (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Long-term experience user, no concerns. Jianhui67 ^T★C 18:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Taichi (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support no concerns here. Elli (talk) 06:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support HouseBlaster (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per answer given below. Glrx (talk) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
•  Support no reason to oppose. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• @The Squirrel Conspiracy: can you list "what must have happened" before a checkuser uses the checkuser tools?--RoyZuo (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

RoyZuo: Sure! Before running a check, the checkuser needs to make sure the check passes three tests:

Test 1: Demonstrated disruption to the project – CheckUser is only used to combat disruption of the project where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs to perpetrate that disruption. Most commonly this is spam or vandalism, but it could also be things like flooding a discussion to try to sway its outcome. The disruption is typically demonstrated in a requests for checkuser case with diffs to support the allegations.

Test 2: The check is necessary to stop the disruption – CheckUser is only used when its use is necessary to stop the disruption. Or to put it another way, if the behavioral evidence is strong enough that an admin is comfortable issuing a block without asking for a check, then they should just do so. The caveat to that is sleepers: if a filer creates a case and the behavioral evidence is strong enough to block the identified accounts without needing a check, but the filer presents a reasonable argument that - based on the actor's behavior - there are likely additional accounts that haven't been identified, the checkuser can still run a check to identify those other accounts.

Test 3: Running the check doesn't violate the privacy policy - Checkusers aren't allowed to reveal an account's IP, because that can reveal their location. If someone created a case accusing user:Example of logging out to double-vote in a discussion as IP 127.0.0.1, the checkuser would have to decline that case.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Thx. Good answers.

Although there's 1 extra thing in my mind:

the reported accounts must have some similarity. that similarity needs to be backed up by url.

if the accounts are obviously two different people, or very unlikely a single person/entity, then a check might not be necessary. this is like a polar opposite to, as you mentioned, the scenario of accounts whose "behavioral evidence is strong enough", which also doesnt need a check to connect them.

In my opinion, "disruption to commons" and "similarity" are two necessary elements for a check. What do you think? RoyZuo (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

RoyZuo: In my mind, similarity was built into the first test. To make that explicit, where I said "where the bad actor is suspected of using multiple accounts or IPs", I could rephrase it as "where there is credible suspicion that the bad actor is using multiple accounts or IPs", and then where I said "The disruption is typically demonstrated" [with diffs], I could change it to "The suspicion is typically demonstrated" [with diffs]. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for being longwinded. I wrote the reply above purely based on common sense and logical deduction, but afterwards I realised it's already all summed up at the top of Commons:Requests for checkuser: "you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related."

Your answers are satisfactory. I hope you stick to such common sense. Thank you. RoyZuo (talk) 08:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Requests for Oversight rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Pagine correlate

• Commons:Permessi degli utenti
• Amministratori inattivi