Jump to content

Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
58,168 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 52,410 (90.1%) 
Undecided
  
 3,225 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
 2,533 (4.4%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-07 07:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to villagers in Sorokotiaha
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-07 07:42 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Teterivka (Uman Raion)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2025-03-07
Scope:
Atrophaneura crassipes (Black Windmill) dorsal
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2025-03-07
Scope:
Coladenia hoenei (Large Spot Pied Flat) dorsal
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2025-03-07
Scope:
Euaspa mikamii (Yellow-disc Hairstreak) ventral
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2025-03-07
Scope:
Tajuria illurgis (White Royal) ventral
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-03-07 10:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Chateau de Najac et emplacement du pont levis (vue depuis le sud-ouest)

Previous reviews

Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Shaan SenguptaTalk on 2025-03-07 11:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan - 1960s
Reason:
Best quality portrait also in use globally -- Shaan SenguptaTalk

Previous reviews

  •  Comment A person's appearance changes over the years. For people who have been notable over many years, it is common to include the year in the scope. There could be several VIs. Hence, my suggestion was to make the scope "Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1962)". --Tagooty (talk) 14:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Best in scope and useful. I've edited the scope to conform to VI style. --Tagooty (talk) 03:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-03-08 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Ginger Rogers in 1942
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-08 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Landscape with wooden bridge by Antonio Diziani - Pinacoteca Egidio Martini

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:31, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-08 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Persicaria amplexicaulis 'Blackfield' - Infloresence
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-03-08 06:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Spondylus varius, right valve
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-08 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Tykhyi Khutir

 Support Useful and used. --Rbrechko (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-08 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Tykhyi Khutir

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-08 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
House on Berezhanska Street 2, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-08 15:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Our Lady of the Rosary, Medukha, Ukraine, view from NE.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-03-08 17:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Spire of the Saint-Amé d'Herlies church, view from Rue de l'Égalité
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-03-08 17:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Houses above S-charl in the fall.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-08 18:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Volvo EX90 - right rear view
Used in:
en:Volvo EX90
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-08 18:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen Tayron II - right rear view
Used in:
de:VW Tayron
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-08 18:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Nissan Micra (K14) - left front view
Used in:
de:Nissan Micra
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-03-08 22:58 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial 1914-1918, in Herlies.- Nord, Hauts-de-France view from Rue du Bourg (Fr)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-09 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de ville d'Agen - Facade of the City Hall, decorated in the colors of Ukraine.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-09 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Male head (Christ triumphant) - Museo civico - Treviso

 Comment Please check the category --Llez (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-09 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Eurolistriodon tenarezensis - Skull upper face

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-03-09 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Spondylus varius, left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-09 07:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Khyzhnia (near the school)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-09 07:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Khyzhnia (at the cemetery)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-03-09 14:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of Good Health Church, Hulikere - front facade
Used in:
wikidata:Q133226207
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-03-09 14:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of Good Health Church, Hulikere - view of entrance gate, shrine and church
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-03-09 16:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Swettepoel View of the lake and the islands. (South side.)
Used in:
wikidata:Q13138183
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-03-09 17:09 (UTC)
Scope:
La convalescente (1910), by Jean Geoffroy, in Hôtel-Dieu de Beaune

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-09 18:29 (UTC)
Scope:
House on Berezhanska Street 11, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-09 18:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Lanckoroński Palace in Khodoriv, Ukraine.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2025-03-09 21:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Sqallla of Essaouira
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-03-10 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Acesta rathbuni (Rathbun’s Giant Lima), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-10 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Battle scene (inv. 110) - Antonio Marini - Pinacotheque Egidio Martini
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-10 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Joseph the Negro by Adolphe Brune - Musée de Cahors Henri-Martin
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-10 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Erysimum linifolium - immature inflorescence
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-10 07:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Khyzhnia

 Support Useful and used. --Rbrechko (talk) 15:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-10 07:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Shulyaky, Uman Raion
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-10 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Bell tower of Saint Nicholas church, Podobovets, Ukraine.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-03-10 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculptures Sur En, Sent. Neururer 2 - Jahr. Artwork by Reinhold Neururer.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-03-11 05:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Acesta rathbuni (Rathbun’s Giant Lima), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-11 05:58 (UTC)
Scope:
(Treviso) The Glory of Emperor Prince Joseph I by Sebastiano Ricci - Museo civico di Santa Caterina
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-11 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Stachyurus chinensis 'Joy Forever' inflorescence
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-11 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Gilberte nue se peignant by Suzanne Valadon, Centre Pompidou
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-11 07:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Shulyaky, Uman Raion
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-11 07:46 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Shulyaky, Uman Raion
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-03-11 15:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Map of Vaitupu, 1931
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-03-11 17:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Close-up of Buddha face in roots of Tetrameles.- Ta Prohm (Angkor), West view (Cambodgia)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-03-11 18:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculptures Sur En, Sent. Bewegung 2018. Artwork by Janos Ruppert.

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-03-12 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mastoniaeforis speciosa, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-12 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
St. John the Baptist Preaching to the Crowds by Giandomenico Tiepol - Museo civico di Santa Caterina
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-12 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Viburnum tinus (Laurestine) - Immature inflorescence
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-12 06:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de Madame Maurice Utrillo, Lucie Valore by Suzanne Valadon
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-12 06:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Holocaust memorial in Mankivka
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-12 06:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Pomynyk
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-12 06:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Pomynyk
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Jujubinus errinae

[edit]

hamster

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2011-12-10 22:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European Hamster)

 Support Excellent. All criteria met.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)  Support Seems to be the best one Kersti (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-01-04 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European hamster)
Reason:
replacing image of museum specimen -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=1008566955"