Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2025/02/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 26th, 2025
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems copied from https://www.instagram.com/p/DGEU1kiNc2V/?locale=zh-hans&hl=af&img_index=1 Plozessor (talk) 04:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from https://www.msn.com/es-xl/noticias/mundo/fotos-del-dia-2025-02-09/ss-AA1yFLzk or https://www.lusa.pt/fotos?imageid=44380034 Plozessor (talk) 05:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently copied from https://sputnik-abkhazia.ru/20190220/Glavnoe-superlunie-2019-1026697305.html#pv=g%3D1026697305%2Fp%3D1026696934 or https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/photography/super-snow-moon-2019-orbit-nasa-supermoon-earth-science-a8787816.html Plozessor (talk) 05:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from https://www.sueddeutsche.de/leben/bilder-des-tages-fotografie-pressefotografie-li.3199754 or elsewhere Plozessor (talk) 05:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Sophielacochonne (talk) 03:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de photos et de nom Loula14000 (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Vandalism, c:Category:Sockpuppets of Sophie lagarce14. --Achim55 (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de photo...photo incorecte Philou760 (talk) 05:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Erreur de photo, incorrecte Philou760 (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per previous DR, most likely vandalism by another sock. Tvpuppy (talk) 05:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, copyvio, widely found on the internet. -- Wutsje 06:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G3. Content intended as vandalism Rishāringânu 08:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 11:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disturbing 185.130.71.139 10:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lol, nonsensical argument. מקף־עברי (talk) 10:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disturbing & privacy issues 185.130.71.139 10:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. מקף־עברי (talk) 10:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disturbing & privacy issues 185.130.71.139 10:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. מקף־עברי (talk) 10:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the image but the image size is small and not clearly visible Dev0745 (talk) 06:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's hazy Soumava2002 (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My picture and I would Like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own picture and I would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My picture and would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is my picture and would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My picture and would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own picture and I would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own picture and I would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My picture and would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own picture and I would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 11:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur des droits d'auteurs Rad-edlL (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made an error uploading this image. It was on the congressman's website; however, a reverse image search indicates it's a Getty Image. See https://archive.ph/wS8DT Guest2625 (talk) 12:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just an empty file page, file had already been deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just an empty file page, file had already been deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just an empty file page. --Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just an empty file page. --Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Mw1100 (talk) 14:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete; borderline F10. Vaguely symbolic nonsense. Omphalographer (talk) 07:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low educational value, blurry, bad angle, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Nudity Syced (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Mutliple better alternatives at Category:Videos of male masturbation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another guy flashing his junk (who probably shouldn't). Out of COM:SCOPE and unused. Wknight94 talk 19:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 08:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, badly lit low quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, mediorcre quality genitalia snapshot. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I do not oppose. Demetrius Talpa (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no opposition from uploader, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This film poster is a w:zh:媽媽的神奇小子, there is no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Hong Kong, and random persons. 茅野ふたば (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW of copyrighted work. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This film poster is a w:zh:媽媽的神奇小子, there is no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Hong Kong, and random persons. 茅野ふたば (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW of copyrighted work. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph has little to nothing to do with Becker, MN 137.81.35.39 21:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion; in appropriate listing. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file I created contains personally identifiable metadata that I require removed. Ncalvin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Metadata hidden. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now I've added the license tag. Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has both a license tag and a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 08:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actualización del logo NICCR (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubinbot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

dont seem to find cc licence on http://newlookmedia.ru . flickr source seems gone.

RoyZuo (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the CC license is still mentioned at the bottom of the page rubin16 (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok. thx.--RoyZuo (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rubin16: could you please review these files https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=newlookmedia+incategory:%22License+review+needed%22 , since you could because you were not the original uploader?--RoyZuo (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closed.--RoyZuo (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fiz o upload por engano e não sou o autor da imagem. Peço a exclusão. HildebrandoFCF (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que je n'arrive pas à le mettre sur la page Wiki de Max Pons... Georges Gara (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

فيه بتض الاخطاء السمع ابن جابر (talk) 23:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work claim. This file appears to be a phone screengrab (see the navigational arrow on the right hand side and the black bar across the lower section). Metadata is stripped. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A part of spam activity, not in use now guess why. No idea how to use it Bilderling (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Polarlys at 20:51, 27 February 2025 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious upload; likely copyright violation; no license or metadata present; user has uploaded 3 previous copyvio images (all deleted) DaHuzyBru (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own picture and would like to remove it Rickard Elofsson (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The hospital where this is located was opened in 1990; therefore, it is unlikely that the sculpture has been a work of an artist who died for more than 50 years. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works, this Panoramio import is a copyright infringement. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is not de minimis here, and it is not an original part of the ancient temple; it was the main lantern for the 2012 Lantern Festival there, titled 祥龍點金‧龍躍金門. The designer was apparently based in Xiamen Prefecture, Fujian. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Taiwan, this image infringes on the sculptural copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan. This map is certainly recent and still under producer's copyright. The base map does not appear to be sourced from freely-licensed sources (like OpenStreetMap etc.). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly named, uncat since 2018 file that appears to have a nonsense description. No context as to what it represents so unknown if it's in scope. (Also no EXIF but no hits on TinEye or Yandex) Abzeronow (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"current headshot, according to this social updates" implies it's not own work by that account. fake claim with fake license. Darwin Ahoy! 03:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ecuador A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1992 by Toshio Ichihashi (1919–2005). There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2076 A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1992 by Toshio Ichihashi (1919–2005). There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2076 A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1977 by Seibo Kitamura (1884–1987). There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2058 A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue was completed in 1944 by Aage Erhard (1898–1991). There is no freedom of panorama in Denmark for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2062 A1Cafel (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1990 by Egon Fischer (1935–2016). There is no freedom of panorama in Denmark for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2087 A1Cafel (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1985 by Leif Vange (1949–). There is no freedom of panorama in Denmark for non-architectural works, permission from the sculptor is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 2018 by Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd (1934–2016). There is no freedom of panorama in Lebanon. The copyright terms of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2067 A1Cafel (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1935 by Helen Schou (1905–2006). There is no freedom of panorama in Denmark for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2077 A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1974 by Arne N. Vigeland (1900–1983). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2054 A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As given by file description itself, the sculpture 堅毅展華 was authored by 胡棟民 and installed in 2010. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works, this image infringes on the sculptural copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 07:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture on top was designed by 江沖默. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works, this image infringes on the sculptural copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sand castles with elaborate designs like this are works of art. No commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan. Unless the photographer is also the artist who made this work, this image is a copyright infringement. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:White sand beach, Boracay Island - panoramio (1).jpg for a similar case from the Philippines, which does not give any FoP exception. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infringement of sculptural copyright, because there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan. The 海豚吉祥物铜雕 was (Google Translate-d) "was donated by the 6th Graduates Association and the Student Union." Suspected recent public artwork, and not yet in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Concentric Circles, a 1994 sculpture by Shu Li-shien (許禮憲). Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works, we cannot host this freely-licensed image of the said copyrighted sculpture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 15:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No commercial COM:FOP Taiwan for artistic works. Work details (source):


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No commercial COM:FOP Taiwan for artistic works. Work details (source):


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illustration from 2024 bag of potato chips from Germany, not okay per Commons:Packaging. Rosenzweig τ 17:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the file description, "Johnnie Walker 1984 Iron". A 1984 artwork in Taiwan is certainly not out of copyright. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works, we cannot host images of this artwork. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 23:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:59, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:59, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:02, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE 1️⃣ 09:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is public library not public place? RoyZuo (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep dosen't focus any specific design, COM:DM. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:MACAU does not mention buildings/architecture being protected works in any way. FOP for "works of art placed in public places" is explicitly allowed. Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating countless seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows discriminatory, racist or sexualising content, which may also has originated in colonial contexts.

The image archive of the ETH-Bibliothek would like to take responsability and has adapted its publishing guidelines and will no longer publish such images online (discriminatory, racist or sexualising content), nor contribute in any way in reproducing such content, see der Sammlungen und Archive der ETH Zürich – ein Leitfaden aus der Praxis

  • Mayor ethical concerns regarding the colonial context of origin
  • The personal integrity of the person depicted should be protected and should be given priority before any other interests
  • The image can only be seen in the database with a watermark (http://doi.org/10.3932/ethz-a-000244706) and its use must be requested and explained.

ETH-Bibliothek (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Does not violate WikiCommons rules. We have the opposite approach and avoid censorship, history is history. Censorship just hides our flawed history and only leaves the sugar coated version online. The image also has no negative context given, we have a man in pith helmet smiling at a bare breasted woman, who is also smiling. Your interpretation: An evil colonial administrator forcefully exposes a woman's breast to show his power over the subjugated locals. --RAN (talk) 16:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. CC licenses are not revocable, see the Creative Commons FAQ. ReneeWrites (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep the ETH-Bibliothek is not in charge of Commons, which fortunately does not believe in whitewashing history to be politically correct and inoffensive. Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What is the thought process behind this?
Can I say that, by severely restricting access to such files, you are trying to censor and hide the colonial past, and avoiding facing the history and bearing responsibility? RoyZuo (talk) 22:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't support deletion, but can we get a grip with the silly "you're erasing/censoring history!!" business? Nobody's burning photos or rewriting history books. These photos aren't even being removed from the library. This is just a move to say "maybe we [the library], as an educational institution in possession of historically significant but plainly exploitative photographs, have a responsibility to take measures to avoid those photos being used for salacious, racist, or otherwise inappropriate purposes, and thus would prefer they not be on Commons for use by anyone for any purpose". That's a completely reasonable thing to want. It's probably not going to happen because we err on the side of keeping everything that's technically legal to keep, for better and worse, but it's not "distorting history" or the like. — Rhododendrites talk23:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Especially, per ReneeWrites and another link located at the Creative Commons FAQ states that: "
  • "While you cannot revoke the license, CC licenses do provide a mechanism for licensors to ask that others using their material remove the attribution information."
I do not know if this has ever happen here on Commons, but I had not previously noticed this CC license "mechanism." -- Ooligan (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The file is not CC, but PD. But the attribution is necessary (at commons, not when reusing the file) to verify the authenticity of the file at commons, even if its viewing is restricted at ETH.
However, it may be sensible to hide the image behind some sort of content warning as is the habit at social media like in former twitter or today Fediverse. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:34, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Db-logo}} 🌸 Esther Rossini 💗 (☕Let's chat) 02:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Hong Kong 茅野ふたば (talk) 02:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Tvpuppy (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating twenty seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete OOS Dronebogus (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete all the Craiyon mythology images. This was an early image model and generated exceptionally low-quality images; it is highly unlikely that these images even remotely resemble popular conceptions of these mythological figures. Omphalographer (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete more cursed AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 22:38, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete OOS Dronebogus (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GermanV1981 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain text files (lists of television programs) that are outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons.

Marbletan (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.instagram.com/p/Csq08XiNbAy/?hl=en

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coats of arms of Belgium Military Forces.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) Commander-pirx (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo User:Didym bitte für alle "20250221 12-Stufen-Theater Ensemble Mona Lisa 0x.jpg" Seiten - mehr als 7 Tage setzen oder Löschdiskussion... ich benötige etwas, um die Freigaben der Theaterleute einzuholen. Danke. mfg --Commander-pirx (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|source=https://www.octa.net/about/leadership/board-of-directors/board-members/janet-nguyen/}} TYPEINFO (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Orange County Transportation Authority is a governmental body, so PD-CAGov still applies. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Yann. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roehrenradio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused charts of unclear significance. Related page de:1. Deutsche Tichu Booster Meisterschaft was deleted in 2022.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request. Per current policies on FOP in Taiwan, photographs of 2D artwork, like murals, are not permitted on Commons. Hiàn (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Tvpuppy (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted COM:TOY. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: I asked about this twice at COM:VPC (the last time at COM:VPC#File:Chucky portrait Child's Play.jpg because of my concerns that this is a derivative work that had perhaps the issues described above by the nominator. I'm not sure Commons can host this given that the "Chucky" doll/toy is the whole point of the photo and that the character's imagery is most likely still under copyright protection given that en:Child's Play (1988 film) came out it 1988 and was heavily merchandised. The Flickr licensing for the photo seems fine, but that would only apply to the photo itself and not the photographed Chucky imagery; so, even though the uploader and the Flickr account holder probably meant the best, this seems to be a case of COM:FLICKRWASHING, unintentional perhaps, but still not OK for Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Protone11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of artwork. The creator of the artwork is Konrad Geldhauser, born 1968. Needs permission sent to COM:VRT in case these uploads are sanctioned by the artist.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Taiwan for 3D objects. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please use Help:VFC in the future to create a multi-image deletion request instead of creating ten seperate DRs with the same rationale. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Taken with Oppo A39 / 2018 Dali Art in Taichung

[edit]

This art installation was installed in 2018 as part of the "Dali Art" project. Since Taiwan does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works, these images infringe on artists' copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 12:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

海豚藝術牆 was made under the direction of school Prof. 劉錫權, with sketches made by teacher 江怡錚 and then-sophomore students 詹智勝 and 林瑋慈. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works, we cannot freely host these images of the copyrighted artwork. The artwork is likely recent, as the school only began to exist in 1994, and these four individuals are likely still living (not yet dead for more than 50 years for this artwork to fall out of copyright).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


  • attention:  Speedy delete the very low resolution one. It is the same image as that of this one that is used on the website of the school that I used for the no-FoP deletion rationale. _
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

允執厥中 artwork under Category:Jingguo Parkway

[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for public art, and we can't host these commercially-licensed CC/PD images of 允執厥中 artwork. According to w:zh:經國綠園道#台灣大道-公益路段(草悟道), the artist who made this was 楚戈, who died in 2011.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan, and we cannot host this Panoramio import. This is the 阿薩斯雕像, authored by U.S.-based production company Blizzard Entertainment. English name: "statue of Arthas". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 14:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom. The character is copyrighted by Blizzard Entertainment. In addition, according to this website [1], Blizzard commissioned artist Steven Wang (王孫杰) to design this statue in 2016. Tvpuppy (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works. This is 雲擁 ("The Cloud that Owns the sky"), a 19501994 sculpture authored by 王慶臺 (Wang Ching-tai) (1950–). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 14:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source provides no confirmation of this seal. It is not found anywhere else except on Wikipedia. 94.43.64.72 14:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Accuracy concerns need to be addressed on the projects where the file is used. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a gallery page: without any image, only text with some links. Commons is not Wikipedia and not a web directory either! See Commons:Galleries for more information. JopkeB (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No commercial COM:FOP Taiwan for artistic works. Artwork details (source):


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same copyrighted artistic work as that of Commons:Deletion requests/File:國立台灣美術館 National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts - panoramio (1).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 16:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same copyrighted artistic work as that of Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts 國立台灣美術館 - panoramio (4).jpg. If we crop away to leave the lower part, then we produced a useless, out of COM:SCOPE image of a girl staring to "nothing" (because we cropped away the artwork), with no proper context as to what made this girl stare at the "nothing" space. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 16:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need to replace Mr.ankitpanicker (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - within G7 window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need to replace Mr.ankitpanicker (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - within G7 window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need to replace Mr.ankitpanicker (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - within G7 window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need to replace Mr.ankitpanicker (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - within G7 window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Veliensis (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - oos. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ugly picture Nurulfarhana0807 (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling? Not a deletion reason. COM:INUSE, so shouldn't be deleted unless there's a copyright problem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A piece of personal art? No clue what this is supposed to be but I can't find anything on the author mentioned in the file description. Nakonana (talk) 19:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - oos. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It’s a very old picture of myself that’s no longer in use and I do not want it to show up in search engines anymore. LeonimuZ (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination / discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, obvious COM:DW of copyrighted artworks. Darwin Ahoy! 23:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture is not out of copyright, and there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan. It is part of the Paper Dome complex that was set up as the gift of the Japanese people to the Taiwanese people in the aftermath of the deadly w:en:1999 Jiji earthquake. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


No objections from the uploader - the stained glass windows were installed in 2007 so it's still protected by Japanese copyright. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States

A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for texts in Hong Kong. 1️⃣ 07:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, signs that only contain minimal and plain text, should be below TOO. Tvpuppy (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for texts in Hong Kong. 1️⃣ 07:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyright for a computer generated list of flags, currencies and prices? RoyZuo (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep simple listing of flags+numbers without any creative aspect, below TOO. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for texts in Hong Kong. 1️⃣ 07:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, the leaflet is above TOO and certainly not de minimis. Tvpuppy (talk) 15:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for interiors in Macau. 1️⃣ 09:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete very blurry ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:55, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here are the remaining decent images of copyrighted public art of this school. These works are unlikely to be in the public domain; the school only started its operations in 1994. Considering two other artworks now nominated (see this for 海豚吉祥物铜雕 and this for 海豚藝術牆), there is no more doubt these two nominated artworks are recent too.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"大巨人腳" under Category:Sculptures of feet

[edit]

"大巨人腳", a giant's foot sculpture in Taichung. The blog and some other sites visited via Google Lens do not thoroughly discuss the artwork's origins, but I suspect it's recent. Unless proven to be out of copyright, we can't host this artwork because there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files, pages from a book (or photographs showing those pages), are claimed to be in the PD . The author Elvira Bauer was born in 1915. Even if we don't know anything of her life after she moved to Berlin in 1943, it is very well possible that she lived beyond 1951, which would mean the book is still protected by copyright per the usual 70 years pma formula. The files should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle unless conclusively shown to be in the public domain or under a free license.

Rosenzweig τ 17:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elvira Bauer (1915-?) - Trau keinem Fuchs auf gruener Heid und keinem Jud bei seinem Eid 1936 Trust No Fox in the Green Meadow and No Jew on his Oath German Nazi propaganda anti-Semitic children's book.pdf for the PDF file of the whole book. --Rosenzweig τ 17:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It is assumed that she died in the war in Berlin, and no death certificate was issued, as was the case for a good portion of the people buried in the rubble during the Battle of Berlin, over 100,000 were killed. She does not show up in the post-war census. --RAN (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Where does it say that "it is assumed that she died in the war in Berlin", that "no death certificate was issued" and that "she does not show up in the post-war census"? Couldn't she have simply married and changed her name? All of this is not in any way evidence that she died before 1952. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As before: These files, pages from a book (or photographs showing those pages), are claimed to be in the PD . The author Elvira Bauer was born in 1915. Even if we don't know anything of her life after she moved to Berlin in 1943, it is very well possible that she lived beyond 1951, which would mean the book is still protected by copyright per the usual 70 years pma formula. The files should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle unless conclusively shown to be in the public domain or under a free license.

Rosenzweig τ 16:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Andreas Geissel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this AxelHH (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:10, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Andreas Geissel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this AxelHH (talk) 23:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reupload after having this one nominated for deletion. Please make sure to delete both. --2003:C0:8F3C:8100:F829:D53D:2558:5EC1 14:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:10, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Andreas Geissel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this AxelHH (talk) 23:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Andreas Geissel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this AxelHH (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Lithuania jlwoodwa (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. The sculptor Romualdas Kvintas passed away in 2018, so it is copyrighted in Lithuania until 2089. Tvpuppy (talk) 02:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The sculpture is in the public space - town squere of Seduva. It is also a monument for Seduva Jews, commissioned by The Lost Shtetl museum, which owns copyrights for this sculpture and other memorials in Seduva. The sculptor is clearly named as author of the picture. DautMari (talk) 06:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The FOP in Lithuania only allows noncommercial uses of representations of such works. Since Commons requires images to be free for commercial uses, unfortunately these images are not allowed in Commons. See {{NoFoP-Lithuania}} for details. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


No objections from the uploader - the stained glass windows were installed in 2007 so it's still protected by Japanese copyright. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1994 by Kjell Nupen (1955–2014). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2085

A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo can't be own or free. A part of spam activity, not in use now guess why. Bilderling (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:G10; uploader's only upload, only other contributions are 6 deleted edits on ruwiki. ~TheImaCow (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously-recent artwork. Unlikely to be old (like 1970s-80s). There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Taiwan for artistic works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 08:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a copy of 023 Salisbury Cathedral North Transept.jpg. It is my image and my error. Richard Avery (talk) 08:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if this butterfly sculpture was installed at around the same time as that of this another artwork (DR). It is unlikely that the sculpture is over 50/70 years old. There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for artistic works in Taiwan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 08:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It comes from his website which states "all rights reserved"; no specific permission releasing this image has been given 331dot (talk) 08:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for public art in Taiwan. Per w:zh:二二八事件烏牛欄戰役紀念碑, the memorial was installed in 2004 and was authored by artist 白滄沂.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 08:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a book cover consisting of copyrighted text and images  —Andreitalk 09:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable band and metadata has a transmission code which suggests it's from social media. Abzeronow (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Faulty recording. tsca (talk) 22:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a personal work. Copied from a post in the Instagram of Lucas Viana. Here's the post : https://www.instagram.com/p/CFal7ZspGkS Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 23:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is essentially just an advertisement for "gamingpcdubai.com/shop/", judging by the description Voidgirl (talk) 09:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 07:31, 9 March 2025 UTC: No license since 1 March 2025 --Krdbot 14:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject in picture is uploader (COM:ADVERT); suspected to be taken from a photographer rather than being taken personally by subject. Tenryuu (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be an old artwork. Google Translat-ing the relevant Chinese wording ("第六十屆全體畢業班贈: 琳勝,以諾、仕恩·森生、毓琳、碧娟、美珊") gives: "The 60th graduating class: Linsheng, Enoch, Shien Sensheng, Yulin, Bijuan, Meishan." Perhaps some of the translated names are plain wrong, but the "60th graduating class" is enough to doubt the artwork's origins. Suspected recent work of art, and there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama to freely reproduce these and other recent works of art in Taiwan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom. The artwork is located in Taiwan Adventist College, which was founded in 1951, according to their website [2]. This means their “60th graduating class” had to been after 2011, hence the artwork also had to be created after 2011. Therefore, the artwork is still copyrighted. Tvpuppy (talk) 04:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:32, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]